(1) Morozevich,Alexander (2731) - Bruzon Bautista,Lazaro (2667) [C97]
Biel GM Biel (6), 30.07.2006
[Marin,M]



1.e4 e5 2.Sf3 Sc6 3.Lb5 a6 4.La4 Sf6 5.0-0 Le7 6.Te1 b5 7.Lb3 d6 8.c3 0-0 9.h3 Sa5 10.Lc2 c5 11.d4 Dc7 12.a3!?
An early deviation from the well-known paths and a consistent move at the same time; something not really unusual for Morozevich. White prepares to win space on the queen side by means of b4.

12...Ld7
Bruzon continues developing in natural way, relying on the soundness of his position. [The obvious drawback of 12.a3 is that it weakens the b3-square and Black could take advantage of it by blocking the queen side with 12...c4 On the other hand, this certainly looks like a concession with respect to the pressure in the centre. However, Black's accurate maneuvering in the following game determined White block the position with d5 anyway, when play transposed to an entirely viable for Black structure. 13.Sbd2 Te8 14.Sf1 Lf8 15.Lg5 Sd7 16.Sg3 Sc6 17.Dd2 Sd8 18.Tad1 Se6 19.Le3 f6 A perfect square for the knight. It keps an eye on the f4-square, inhibiting the opening of the king side by means of f4 and is ready to jump to c5 if attacked with d5. 20.Sf5 Sb6 21.Sh2 Lb7 22.Sg4 Tad8 Finally, the pressure of the blackpieces has become so strong that, fearing the central break ...d5, White decides to prevent it in radical way. 23.d5 Sc5 24.f4~~ 1/2-1/2 Ciocaltea,V-Bisguier,A/Caracas 1970/MCD (65)]

13.b4
[The more restratined 13.b3 is also possible. Having taken the c4- and b4-squares under control and cleared the a2-square for the rook, White induces some differences compared to the classical lines based on ...Ld7. 13...Tfe8 (For instance, after the standard moves 13...cxd4 14.cxd4 Tac8 he can defend the bishop by developing a piece at the same time with 15.Ta2!? while 15...Sc6 can be met by 16.d5 when the knight has not the plan ...Sb4, ...a5, ...Sa6 at his disposal, being more or less forced to return to a5.) 14.Sbd2 Lf8 15.d5 g6 Black invests some time in regrouping with his bishop, but the higher emergency seems to be the recycling the a5-knight. (15...c4 16.b4 Sb7 17.a4 a5 18.Sf1 Teb8 19.Sg3 Sd8 20.Sh2 Se8 /\f6, g6, Sg7, Sf7, with a harmonious placement of pieces.) 16.Sf1 Lg7 17.Sg3 c4 18.b4 Sb7 19.Le3 a5 20.Dd2 (White should not leave to his opponent free hands on the queen side. 20.a4! would have kept the counterplay under control, while the problem of the b7-knight would be not solved yet, because the double exchange of pawns on the queen side would still leave White with a pawn on b4.) 20...Ta6 21.Sh4 Tea8<=> Now, Black has obtained strong pressure along the a-file, which restricts White's active possibilities on the other wing, 1/2-1/2 Ljubojevic,L (2565)-Ivkov,B (2520)/Manila 1973/EXT 98 (35)]

13...cxb4
[This exchange allows White capture towards the centre, increasing his influence in that area of the board, but the immediate 13...Sc4 would allow 14.bxc5 dxc5 15.dxe5 Sxe5 16.Sxe5 Dxe5 17.f4 with even stronger initiative in the centre.]

14.axb4 Sc4 15.Sbd2 Sb6
It appears that White does not enjoy absolute stability on the c4-square. [The immediate opening of the queen side by means of 15...a5 would leave White with the upper hand after 16.Sxc4 Dxc4 (Possibly, Black should just forget about maintaining piece control of this square and accept a slightly worse but solid position after 16...bxc4 17.La3+/= ) 17.bxa5! Dxc3 18.Ld2 Dc7 19.Lb4+/= with strong pressure.]

16.Ta3 Tfc8 17.Lb2 a5
By putting pressure on the c3-pawn, Black has determined his opponent place his queen's rook and bishop on slightly unnatural squares. Bruzon tries to take advantage of this by active play. However, the opening of the position in the immediate neighbourhood of these pieces will help White improve their situation, by exchanging the rook in order to clear a better square for the bishop. Moreover, the complications initiated by his last move are difficult to control and evaluate. [A more static approach based on the increase of the control over the relatively weak c4-square would have had more chances for equality. 17...Le6!? planning the return of the knight to c4 would be well suited for this purpose, since the apparently disturbing 18.Sg5 is connected with the loss of a pawn after 18...exd4 for instance 19.Sxe6 fxe6 20.Lb3 d5 ]

18.Txa5 Txa5 19.bxa5 Sa4 20.Lxa4 bxa4
Black might have hoped that he would recuperate the sacrificed pawn soon, when his well defended a4-pawn would supposedly offer him good play, but things are by far not that easy.

21.La3!
A perfect square for the bishop. It blocks the enemy pawn and puts pressure along the a3-f8 diagonal.

21...Dxc3
Practically forced. Otherwise, White would consolidate his position with Lb4.

22.Sb1?!
But this move looks too passive. [22.Te3! looks like a better chance for an advantage: 22...Dxa5 23.dxe5 Se8 24.Sf1! and the pin along the d-file will soon cost Black the d6-pawn. (By refraining from defending the bishop by means of the rook lift, Morozevich might have feared to weaken his back rank, which would have been a telling factor in the following variation 24.exd6 Lxd6 25.Lxd6 Sxd6 26.Td3 Da6 27.Sf1 Tc1! 28.Txd6 Txd1 29.Txa6 Txf1+!= ) ]

22...Dc6!
The correct retreat. Black puts the e4-pawn under pressure, thus taking advantage of the passive character of White's previous move. Capturing the a5-pawn would have allowed White create a strong pair of connected pawns y means of dxe5xd6 and e5.

23.dxe5 Sxe4 24.exd6 Lf6 25.Dd3
The first wave of complications has passed and time has come to draw some conclusions. White has retained a small material advantage and his passed pawns keep Black under permanent pressure. However, the presence of the d6-pawn can have a double edged influence over the course of the game. Instead of trying to capture it and get under unpleasant pins, Black can use it as a shelter for his bishops. Besides, the passivity of his b1-knight considerably restricts his chances for an advantage, especially that Black's pieces are very active.

25...Sc5
The knight is aiming for the more stable b3-square. [The attempt to consolidate it with 25...Lf5? would fail painfully to 26.Sfd2 Sxd2 27.Dxf5! when the strength of the d-pawn is illustrated by the variation 27...Sxb1 28.d7 Td8 29.Dd5!+- ]

26.De3 Sb3 27.Sbd2 Te8 28.Se4 Ld8
White has managed to activate his knight, but his a5-pawn is in danger. Besides, the pin along the e-file is rather annoying.

29.Sd4 Sxd4?!
The exchange of this knight that has consumed 4 tempi to reach an active and stable square is an obvious concession. [Black should have maintained the tension with 29...Dd5 when after 30.Sxb3 Dxb3 31.Dxb3 axb3 it is a good moment to recall Nimzovitsch' recomendation according to which an outpost on an open line should be converted into a passed pawn. It is easy to notice that the white bishop would lose part of its efficiency, since it would have to split his efforts on two diagonals already. Bruzon might have feared that after 32.a6 he would have problems control both enemy pawns. If this is true, he must have underestimated the threats he could create against the enemy king starting with 32...Lb6! (32...f5? 33.a7 Lc6 34.Sf6+!+- ; 32...Lc6? 33.Tc1 Lxe4 34.d7+- ) 33.Tb1 Txe4 34.Txb3 Ld4 However, 35.Lb2 (The point behind Black's 32nd move is that after 35.Tb7? Te1+ (But not 35...Lc6? when the calm 36.Kf1!!+/- prevents the attack and leaves Black with problems fighting against the far advanced pawns; most likely, he would have to give up a rook for them, which would hardly save the game.) 36.Kh2 Lc6-/+ and White has no time to continue advancing his pawns because of the threat ...Le5+ followed by mate on h1.) 35...Lc5 36.Tb8+ Te8 37.a7 seems to save the day for WHite: 37...Lxa7 38.Tb7 Te1+ 39.Kh2 Lxf2 40.Txd7 f6= with a probable draw.]

30.Dxd4
As a consequence of Black's mistake, the queen has been centralized, keeping both enemy wings under pressure. One natural question is whether there is anything interesting left on the black queen side; the answer is given by the first line given in the comments to Black's 31st move.

30...f6
Not a very aesthetical move, but Black wants to make the threat against the a5-pawn real. [30...Lxa5? would lose to 31.Lb2 f6 32.Sxf6+! which gladly gives up a knight and a rook in order to create decisive threats: 32...gxf6 33.Dxf6 Txe1+ 34.Kh2+- ]

31.Te3
Although with some delay, White reaches a perfect coordination of forces. The rook defends the bishop and is ready to create king side threats. After the exchange of one pair of knights, the bishop has increased his strength. Besides blocking the enemy pawn and defending the own, it can eventually offer reliable support to the own pieces, especially on the c3- and c5-squares.

31...Lxa5
This long awaited capture offers White the possibility of obtaining a very strong attack. Since Black's regroupment can be considered to a certain extent optimal (giving the circumstances, of course), the only reasonable alternative would consist of the activation of the rook along the e-file. [31...Te6 can be strongly met by 32.Da7!+/- when 32...f5 (32...Txe4 33.Txe4 Dxe4 34.Dxd7+- ) allows White display impressive piece activity with 33.Tc3 Db5 34.Tc5 Db1+ 35.Tc1 Db5 36.Sc3 Dc6 37.Se2 Db5 38.Sd4+- Being restrained to the short b5-c6 diagonal in order to keep the bishop defended, the queen has been submitted to 6 consecutive attacks, finally leading to material losses.; 31...Te5 32.Sc5 Td5 33.Dc4 Kh8 34.De2+- reveals the main deffect of the black rook's activation: the weakness of the back rank.]

32.Sxf6+!
According to the classical precepts, the logical conclusion of a strategically well-conducted game is a sacrificial mating attack. This does not mean that Black is lost already, but the degree of difficulty of his defensive problems is abruptly increased now. White could not delay the moment of this action, since on the next move Black could return with the bishop to d8 and safely defend his king side.

32...gxf6 33.Tg3+ Kf7 34.Dh4
Quiet moves are always difficult to meet when being submitted to a dangerous attack. The defending part faces not only a wide choice of moves, but also the difficult task to understand which threats are real and which just illusory.

34...Te1+
[When watching this game live on my mobile phone, the first defence I could spot for Black was 34...Lc3!? . Black not only removes the bishop from an exposed square, but also defends the important f6-square and enables using the bishop as a shelter for the king. The first reaction of Fritz 9 is that Black is completely lost, but this must be caused only by the "horizon effect"; things are not that clear in fact. Indeed, after 35.Dxh7+ (35.Dh5+ is more or less similar, so that White should grab a pawn on the way.) 35...Ke6 36.Te3+ Le5 (But not 36...Kd5? when with a series of accurate checks White can win the c3-bishop: 37.Dh5+ Te5 38.Df3+!+- ) 37.f4 White wins back the bishop, but Black can repel the first wave of attack and try taking advantage of the weakened position of the enemy king induced by the last move: 37...Db6 38.Kf2 (After 38.Dd3 Kf7 39.fxe5 Txe5 it is not easy to defend the rook, preserve the minimal material advantage, prevent the enemy a-pawn from advancing and avoid the perpetual check at the same time. It would be too much! For instance: 40.Lc1 Dc5 41.Ld2 Ke6 42.Kh2 Dxd6= ) 38...Dd4 39.fxe5 Df4+ 40.Tf3 Dd4+ 41.Kg3 Dxe5+ and Black has every chance to make a draw.]

35.Kh2 De4?
This centralization of the queen parries White's main king side threats, but loses the bishop without managing to generate adequate counterplay. [Now that the white king has been removed from the g1-a7 diagonal, 35...Lc3 is not entirely adequate any more. White could play 36.Dxh7+ Ke6 37.f4!? (The point behind this move is not only to take an important square around the black king under control, but also to cover the h2-b8 diagonal. The immediate 37.Tg7? is bad in view of 37...Le5+! ; However, Fritz' suggestion 37.De7+ Kf5 38.Df7 looks also dangerous for Black.) 37...Kd5 (37...f5 38.Dg8+ Kf6 39.Tg6# ; 37...Ld4 38.De7++- ; 37...Db6 38.De7+ Kd5 39.Td3+ Kc4 40.Txc3+ Kxc3 41.Dxe1++- ; 37...Le8 38.Tg7 Dc4 39.Dg8++- ) 38.Df7+ Le6 39.Dh5+ f5 40.Df3+ Te4 41.Dxc3+/- Dxc3 42.Txc3 Black faces a joyless defence with two pawns down, because 42...Txf4? loses to 43.Tc5+! Kd4 44.Tc7+- ; Black's last chance for survival consisted of 35...Lf5! , covering more or less the same squares as the game move and indirectly defending his colleague by obstructing the fifth rank at the same time. For instance: 36.Dh5+ Ke6 37.Tg7 Ld8 38.Df7+ Ke5 39.Tg8 Lg6 40.Da7 Db6 41.Dxa4 Dxf2+/= The maximum what White could achieve is to exchange queens and then capture the d8-bishop, but with the black king close to the passed d-pawn, Black should be entitled to hope for a draw.]

36.Dh5+ Ke6 37.Dxa5+- Db1 38.Tg7 Th1+ 39.Kg3 Dd3+ 40.f3
Black's counterplay has extinguished rather quickly and the black king is helpless now.

40...Db5 41.Te7+ Kf5 42.Dc7
Over-attacking the bishop that is not only blocking the enemy pawn but also covering two essential diagonals. [42.Dc7 Lc6 (42...Le6 shortens the line by one move in view of 43.Dc2+ ) 43.Dc8+ Ld7 44.Dc2+ with mate to follow soon.] 1-0