Shamkir: Karjakin schlägt Topalov, So besiegt Kramnik

von ChessBase
25.04.2017 – Wer erinnert sich? 2006 kämpften Kramnik und Topalov in Elista mit harten Bandagen um die Weltmeisterschaft. Etwas mehr als zehn Jahre später spielen sie beide im Gashimov-Gedenkturnier mit und kassierten heute Niederlagen gegen Spieler, die deutlich jünger sind. Beide wurden mit den eigenen Waffen geschlagen. Tiger Hillarp-Persson hat Kramniks Niederlage kommentiert

Das dynamische Spiel, basierend auf einem starken strategischen Fundament, hat mich von jeher fasziniert, und ich habe auf diesen DVDs die Varianten vorgeschlagen, die ich auch persönlich in der Praxis bevorzuge.

Sind es die Anzeichen eines Generationswechsels? In der 5. Runde des Gashimov-Memorials in Shamkir gewann heute Sergey Karjakin gegen Veselin Topalov, Wesley So besiegte Vladimir Kramnik. Die beiden Unterlegen kämpften 2006 noch beim offiziell so nie genannten Wiedervereinigungs-Wettkampf in Elista um den Weltmeisterschaftstitel - am Brett, vor allem aber auch noch abseits des Brettes. Das ist nun schon mehr als zehn Jahre her. Wie bei manchen anderen WM-Duellen entstand auch hier eine innige lebenslange Feindschaft. Kramnik und Topalov geben sich wohl immer noch nicht die Hand. Trotzdem sind die beiden Spitzengroßmeister durch viele gemeinsame Teilnahmen an Spitzenturnieren irgendwie aneinander gekettet. Heute teilten sie beide das Erlebnis einer Niederlage- gegen Spieler, die weitaus jünger sind. 

Gestern hatte Kramnik sich mit einem genialen positionellen Turmopfer aus einer schwierigen Situation befreit und sich mit dieser Partie in zukünftige Lehrbücher eingetragen. Heute wurde er von Wesley So mit eigenen Waffen geschlagen, nicht mit einem Turmopfer, aber mit der Katalanischen Eröffnung, von Kramnik populär gemacht, und mit herausragender technik im Endspiel.

Die Partie verlief in ruhigen positionellen Bahnen lange ausgeglichen, aber um den 30. Zug herum erarbeitete sich So einen gewissen Vorteil mit seinen aktiveren Figuren. Nach und nach infiltrierten seine Steine Kramniks Stellung. Unter dem Druck verlor Kramnik mit dem Damentausch einen Bauern. Im Endspiel mit Läufer und Springer gegen zwei Springer bewätigte So die technische Phase souverän und kassierte den ganzen Punkt. 

Tiger Hillarp-Persson hat die Partie kommentiert:

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.c4 e6 2.g3 d5 3.Bg2 Nf6 3...dxc4 here or on the next move, is the other direction the game can take. 4.Nf3 Be7 5.0-0 5.cxd5?! is a strategical mistake before Black has committed to b6. After exd5 6.0-0 0-0 7.d4 c6 8.Nc3 Bf5 is hard for White achieve e4, while the Carlsbad minority attack, with b2-b4-b5 is almost impossible to get working. Black is already a bit better. 5...0-0 6.d4 6.b3 b6 After this move cxd5 becomes a possibility. The point is that light squares has been weakened and if Black answers with exd5, then after Nf3-e5 Black will have little choice but to play c5 at some stage and accept a couple of hanging pawns. 6...d4 7.e3 c5 8.exd4 cxd4 9.d3 Nc6 10.Re1 leads to a Benoni set-up with colours reversed, which would be a formidable weapon in the hands of someone who wants to create an unbalanced game. 6...c5 7.e3 7.Bb2!? d4 8.e3 Nc6 9.exd4 cxd4 10.Re1! is another Benoni inspired line where the drawing tendencies are low. 10.d3 e5 and the bishop makes no sense on b2. 7...b6 7.Bb2 7.Nc3 Bb7 8.d4 Nbd7 9.Bb2 Rc8 10.cxd5 Nxd5 11.Nxd5 Bxd5 12.Qd3 c5 13.e4 Bb7 14.Rad1 14.Rfd1 14...cxd4 15.Nxd4 Nf6 16.Qe2 Qe8 as in Kramnik,V (2805)-Aronian,L (2785) 8th London Classic 2016, was not without complications. 7...Bb7 8.cxd5 Nxd5 8...exd5 9.d4 Nbd7 10.Nc3 Re8 11.Rc1 scores quite well for White, perhaps not because White's position is better, but since it is harder to handle Black's structure for a human. 9.d4 Nd7 9...c5 was played by Aronian and could be the better move. 10.Re1 c5 11.e4 N5f6 12.Nc3 (Ever noticed how few really strong GM:s there are who place their knight on d2 when c3 is an option?) cxd4 13.Nxd4 Ne5 14.Qe2! Bc5 14...Qxd4 15.Nd5 Qc5 16.Rac1 Qd6 17.Nxe7+ 17.Bxe5!? might be even stronger. 17...Qxe7 18.Bxe5 Rac8 19.Bb2 and White will continue with f3 and enjoy the bishop pair in an endgame with pawns on both sides. 15.Red1 Qe7 16.Na4 Bxd4 17.Bxd4 Nc6 18.Be3 Rfd8 19.Nc3 Qb4 20.Qb2 Ng4 21.Bf4 Nce5 22.a3 Qc5 23.Na4 Qb5 24.Nc3 Qc5 25.Na4 Qb5 26.h3 Nd3 27.Rxd3 Rxd3 28.hxg4 Qxb3 29.Bf1 and White went on to win, in So,W (2820)-Onischuk,A (2665) ch-USA 2017. 6...dxc4 I dare say that noone understands the Catalan better than Kramnik, so it is well worth noting which line he chooses with the black side. 7.Qc2 The other main line goes 7.Ne5 , when Black most reliable counter was seen today on a adjacent board: Nc6 8.Bxc6 8.Nxc6 bxc6 9.Na3 has also been played a lot, but it leads to terribly forced variations where it seems to me that Black is not doing worse. 8...bxc6 9.Nxc6 Qe8 10.Nxe7+ Qxe7 11.Qc2 c5 12.Qxc4 cxd4 13.Qxd4 e5 14.Qh4 Qb7 15.Nc3 Be6 16.Bg5 Nd5 17.Nxd5 Qxd5 18.b3 f6 19.Be3 Qb5 20.Rfe1 a5 21.f3 Rfc8 22.Kf2 a4 23.Qe4 axb3 24.axb3 Rxa1 25.Rxa1 Qxb3 26.Ra8 Rxa8 27.Qxa8+ and draw was soon agreed. 7...a6 8.a4 8.Qxc4 b5 9.Qc2 Bb7 10.Bd2 was a line that attracted a lot of attention for many years. However Black came up with a very solid anti-dote with Be4 11.Qc1 Bb7! when White has been unable to set Black any real problems. 11...c6 is a new continuation for those who shun draws before move 15. 8...Bd7 9.Qxc4 Bc6 10.Bf4 10.Bg5 has been more popular. A recent game went Bd5 11.Qc2 Be4 12.Qc1 h6 13.Bxf6 Bxf6 14.Nbd2 Bxf3 15.Nxf3 a5 16.Qc3 Nc6 17.Rad1 Nb4 18.Ne5 c6 19.e4 Rc8 20.Ng4 c5 21.Nxf6+ Qxf6 22.e5 22.d5!? 22...Qe7 23.d5 exd5 24.Bxd5 Rcd8 with a balanced game; Adams,M (2760)-Harikrishna,P (2755) Du Te Cup 2017 (although White soon went wrong and lost). 10...a5 This has gone for main- to sub-line in a short time. Black is planning to exchange Bc6 for Nf3 at an opportune moment and then argue the bishop pair is of little use when the opponent has such a wonderfully harmonious pawn structure. 10...Bd6 has taken over as the most common. Aronian played two games on the black side lately: 11.Qc1 Bxf4 11...a5 12.Nc3 Na6 13.Bd2 Nb4 14.Qb1 Bxf3 15.Bxf3 c6 16.Rd1 Qe7 17.Ne4 Nxe4 18.Qxe4 Rfd8 19.Bc3 Rd7 20.Rd2 Qd8 21.Rad1 Be7 22.h4 Rb8 23.e3 Nd5 24.Qc2 Qc7 25.Kg2 g6 26.h5 and White had managed to ge an initiative, in Ding Liren (2760)-Aronian,L (2785) Sharjah Grand Prix 2017. 12.Qxf4 Qd6 13.Qc1 Bd5 14.Nc3 Nc6 15.e3 Nb4 16.Qb1 16.a5!? Qe7 17.Nxd5 Nbxd5 18.Ne5 16...Qe7 17.a5 c5 18.Nxd5 Nfxd5 19.e4 Nc7 20.dxc5 Qxc5 21.e5 Qe7 Eljanov,P (2755)-Aronian,L (2780) 79th Tata Steel GpA 2017. Black had solved the opening problems and went on to win. 11.Nc3 Nbd7 12.Qd3 In this part of the game, play is all about whether White gets to play e2-e4. White threatens to play e4. Bb4 Black stops e2-e4. 13.Rfe1 White threatens to play e4. Re8 Black can answer e2-e4 with Nc5, so he takes a moment to prepare some activity of his own (e6-e5). 14.Qc2 Now e2-e4 is in the making, again. 14.e4? Bxc3 15.bxc3 Bxe4! 16.Rxe4? Nc5 14...Bxf3 Black finally decides to exchange the bishop. There was no good way to stop e4 anymore. 14...Bxc3?! 15.bxc3 Be4 16.Qb2 h6 16...c5 17.Ng5 and Black regrets the insertion of a4 and a5 since his queenside is quite weak. 17.Bf1 b6 18.Red1 Bb7 19.Ne5 and White has been able to keep the bishop pair without compromising the pawn structure, so White is better. 15.Bxf3 c6 This structure arise in most of the games in this line. White has more space and the bishop pair, but Black lacks weaknesses and has a nice outpost on b4. Some might find this position to be boring, but at this stage I was basically jumping up and down from the excitement of seeing two such great players dealing with it. 16.Red1! Black has exchanged the bishop on c6, so White no longer needs the rook on e1 in order to play e4. Now White plans to improve the knight... 16.Na2? Bxe1 16...Qe7 17.Na2 Bd6 18.Bxd6 Qxd6 19.Nc1 Around this point in the game something goes wrong, but I really struggle to see what it is. Kramnik's moves all seem reasonable. Nd5 20.e4 Nb4 21.Qc3 e5 21...f5?! aims to wrestle control of d5 from White, but it is a double edged victory. After 22.Nb3 a5 remains weak and e6 is a new target. If Black tries to ride out the game in passive manner with 21...Qe7 , then White will play 22.Nb3 and follow up with Bg2 and f4 before deciding on how to continue. Black has no good way to solve the problem with the weak a5-pawn (apart from keeping the rook on a8 and the queen on e7), since b6 just creates a new set of weaknesses (White will immediately re-route the knight on b3 to d3 or e3). Perhaps the whole set-up with queen on e7 and rook on a8 is too passive and Black should try 21...Rad8 22.Nb3 Qc7!? The advantage of such a set-up is that Black only needs one piece to keep an eye on a5. White keeps a slight advantage, but needs to come up with an active plan. 22.Nb3 Qe7 23.Bg2 exd4 24.Rxd4 As I'm watching this game live, I'm prone to exclaim the opening to be a slight success for White, so it will be very exciting to see if I'm right. How will Kramnik deal with the a5-weakness and the Bg2/f4/e5-plan? Nf8!? Here the knight is out of harms way when White starts throwing the f- and e-pawns forward and it can also challenge the rook on d4. Black's dream scenario is to be able to exchange a couple of knights and enter a N+Q vs. B+Q endgame. The N+Q has a tendency to be quite good here, especially if White has weakened his queenside. Black would like to solve his problems with 24...b6 , but then, after 25.Rad1 Nf6 26.f3 c5 27.R4d2 Red8 28.Bf1 White is basically a pawn up, since the pawns on the queenside are immobile. Also, the knight on b4 is out of play, the bishop will find an excellent square on c4 and later on in the endgame c4 is a juicy square for the white knight. Considering how the game continues, Black could try something drastic, like: 24...Nf6 25.f3! h5!? 26.Rad1 h4 Hard to believe in though. 27.Qc5!? 25.Rad1 Red8 26.R1d2!? A very tricky move. So simply threatens to take on d8 and then a5 and perhaps he guessed the Kramnik would be reluctant to touch the b-pawn. 26.e5 is more forceful and leads to some initiative for White after b6 27.f4 26...Ne6? Such a move means that Kramnik is not in good shape. 26...g6 would prepare exchanges on d4, so as not to invite the knight to f5. However, after 27.Rxd8 Rxd8 28.Nxa5 Ra8 29.Nc4 Rxa4 30.Rd1 White is still much better. 26...b6! After 27.e5 White has some initiative still, but Black is close to equality. 27.Rxd8+ Rxd8 28.Nxa5 Ra8 29.Nc4 Rxa4 30.Nd6 Now Black is in trouble. White's pieces could not be better placed, while the knight on b4 is suddenly without support. Ra1+ 31.Bf1 Na6! A persistent move. If instead 31...c5 , then 32.Kg2 Nc6 33.Bc4 b6 34.b4! Ra8 35.Nf5 Qc7 36.bxc5 bxc5 37.Bd5 looks hopeless for Black. For instance: Re8 38.Nxg7 Nxg7 39.Qxc5 Rc8 40.Rc2 wins two pawns for White. 32.Kg2 Nac7 I often meet players who think that there is some inherent value in pieces protecting one another. Indeed, it might seem like strong players have a tendency to keep everything connected. "Seem" is the operative word here. Harmony and mutual protection is not the same thing. But, if there is a weak square somewhere and one side directs the knights towards that square, it is not uncommon for these knights to protect one another. It is a consequence of another factor; of coordination. Here the knights protect each other because the knight on e6 is a pillar in the defence and if you try to protect it from c5, then the knight can be kicked with b4. 33.Nf5 Qe8 34.Bc4 White's pieces are all one great squares. It is unlikely that Black can defend this. Ra8 35.Rd6!? 35.Nd6 Qe7 36.Nxb7 wins a pawn, but So prefers to keep the pressure. 35...Qf8 36.Rd7 Re8 37.Qe5! A very strong move, since it forces Black to enter a position that is lost. The engine likes a number of move better, but from a human point of view this is just the best; not allowing any curved balls from Black. b5 The best defence was 37...g6 , when 38.Nd6 is good, but 38.Qf6 gxf5 39.exf5 Qg7 40.Qxg7+ Kxg7 41.fxe6 Nxe6 42.Rxb7 looks like a sure road to victory. This is probably why So played Qe5. 38.Ba2 g6 This should lose immediately. However, the alternative 38...Na6 39.Ra7 Nac5 is not much better: 40.b4 Na4 41.Rxf7 Qxf7 42.Nd6 Qf6 43.Qxf6 gxf6 44.Nxe8 Kf8 45.Nxf6+- 39.Ne3? Here So could have ended the game with 39.Rxf7! Kxf7 39...Qxf7 40.Nh6+ 40.Qxc7+ Kf6 41.Qxc6! gxf5 42.exf5 and White is winning since Kxf5 falls on 43.Bxe6+ Rxe6 43...Kf6 44.Bd7+ 44.Qf3+ 39...Re7 40.Rxe7 Qxe7 41.Ng4 Qg5 41...Qd8 42.Nh6+ Kf8 43.Qh8+ Ke7 44.Qxh7 Ng5 45.Ng8+ Ke8 46.Qh4± 42.Nf6+ Kh8 43.Nd7+ Qxe5 44.Nxe5 Nd4 45.Bxf7+- c5 46.f4 c4 47.Kf2 Kg7 48.Ke3 Nb3 49.g4 Nc5 49...Na1 50.g5 Nc2+ 51.Kf3 Ne1+ 52.Kf2 Nd3+ 53.Nxd3 Kxf7 54.Ne5+ Ke7 55.Ke3+- 50.h4 Na4 51.b3 cxb3 52.Bxb3 Nc5 53.Bd1 h6 54.Nc6 N7a6 55.Kd4 Ne6+ 56.Ke5 Nec5 57.Bc2 b4 58.Nd4 g5 59.hxg5 hxg5 60.f5 Nd7+ 61.Kd6 Nf6 62.e5 Nxg4 63.Ne6+ Kh6 63...Kf7 64.Nxg5+ Kg7 65.Ne6+ Kf7 66.Bb3 Nh6 67.f6+- 64.f6 Nb8 65.Ba4 Kg6 and the game ended. Whether on time or because 66.Be8+ followed by f7 wins, I don't know. Anyway, a great game. There is still life in the Catalan. 1–0
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
So,W-Kramnik,V-1–02017E05Gashimov Memorial5

Auch Veselin Topalov erlitt seine Niederlage auf eigenem Terrain - in scharfem Angriffschach. Bei den London Chess Classic 2016 hatte Topalov eine wilde Partie gegen Hikaru Nakamura in der Vorstoßvariante der Caro-Kann-Verteidigung verloren. Nakamura hatte die Variante mit 3...c4 gewählt und ging aus den Verwicklungen als Sieger hervor. Offenbar hatte Topalov Gefallen an der schwarzen Spielweise gefunden und probierte sie nun selber aus. Gegen Karjakins Spielweise kam Topalov jedoch nie zu völligem Ausgleich. Schließlich ging Karjakin mit wuchtigen taktischen Schlägen gegen Topalovs im Zentrum gebliebenen König vor. Nach 30 Zügen war die Partie schon vorbei.

_REPLACE_BY_ADV_1

Weißes Läuferfianchetto in Damenbauerspielen scheint in Mode zu kommen. In den meisten Partien war dies heute das Thema. Teimour Radjabov und Michael Adams starteten mit der gleichen Variante der Katalanischen Eöfffnung wie So und Kramnik. Ab Zug sieben nahm die Partie eine andere Richtung und endete schließlich remis. Die Katalanische Eröffnung stand auch zwischen Pavel Eljanov und Radoslaw Wojtaszek zur Diskussion - auch hier mit der Punkteteilung am Ende. In Penteala Harikrishna gegen Shakriyar mamedyarov hatte auch Schwarz fianchettiert - so war es also eine Grünfeld-Verteidigung - hier ebenfalls eine Punkteteilung.

Ergebnisse der 5. Runde

Br. Titel Name Land ELO Erg. Titel Name Land ELO
1 GM Wesley So
 
2794 1 - 0 GM Vladimir Kramnik
 
2809
2 GM Sergey Karjakin
 
2785 1 - 0 GM Veselin Topalov
 
2760
3 GM Penteala Harikrishna
 
2770 ½ - ½ GM Shakhriyar Mamedyarov
 
2768
4 GM Pavel Eljanov
 
2762 ½ - ½ GM Radoslaw Wojtaszek
 
2749
5 GM Teimour Radjabov
 
2710 ½ - ½ GM Michael Adams
 
2748

Partien von Runde 1 bis 5

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.d4 exd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nxc6 bxc6 6.e5 Qe7 7.Qe2 Nd5 8.Nd2 a5 9.c4 Nb6 10.b3 C45: Scotch Game 10.Qe4 d5 11.exd6 cxd6 12.Be2 Qxe4 13.Nxe4 Be6 14.c5 dxc5 15.Be3 Nd5 16.Bxc5 Nf4 17.Bxf8 Kxf8 18.g3 Nxe2 19.Kxe2 1/2-1/2 (49) Radjabov,T (2744)-Topalov,V (2777) Bilbao 2008 10...a4 11.Bb2 axb3 12.axb3 Black has an edge. Rxa1+ 13.Bxa1 Qa3 14.Qd1 Bb4 15.Bd3 Qa5 16.Ke2 d6 17.Qc2 Strongly threatening Bd4. dxe5 18.Bb2N Qc5 19.Nf3 Bg4 20.Bxh7 Nd7 21.Bf5 Bxf3+ 22.Kxf3 g6 23.Bxd7+ Kxd7 24.Qe4 Re8 25.Ke2 Kc8 26.Rd1 White is fighting back (2) f5 27.Qh4 Qe7 28.Qg3 g5 29.Bc3 Bc5 30.Bd2
30.Ra1= keeps the balance. 30...f4! 31.Qh3+ Kb7 32.b4! Bd4 ...e4 is the strong threat. 33.Qd3 33.b5= 33...Rd8 Black should play 33...Qd7 Hoping for ...e4. 34.b5 cxb5 35.Qe4+ Qc6 36.Qxc6+ Kxc6 34.b5 Qe6 White should prevent ...cxb5. 35.bxc6+ Kxc6 36.f3 Rb8 37.Be1 g4 38.Rd2 gxf3+ 39.Qxf3+?
39.gxf3= Kd7 40.Bf2 39...e4
0–1
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
So,W2822Mamedyarov,S27720–120174th Shamkir Chess 20171
Karjakin,S2783Harikrishna,P2755½–½20174th Shamkir Chess 20171
Eljanov,P2751Radjabov,T27101–020174th Shamkir Chess 20171
Wojtaszek,R2745Kramnik,V2811½–½20174th Shamkir Chess 20171
Topalov,V2741Adams,M2761½–½20174th Shamkir Chess 20171
Kramnik,V2811Radjabov,T2710½–½20174th Shamkir Chess 20172
Mamedyarov,S2772Karjakin,S2783½–½20174th Shamkir Chess 20172
Adams,M2761So,W2822½–½20174th Shamkir Chess 20172
Harikrishna,P2755Eljanov,P27510–120174th Shamkir Chess 20172
Wojtaszek,R2745Topalov,V27410–120174th Shamkir Chess 20172
So,W2822Wojtaszek,R2745½–½20174th Shamkir Chess 20173
Karjakin,S2783Adams,M27610–120174th Shamkir Chess 20173
Eljanov,P2751Mamedyarov,S27720–120174th Shamkir Chess 20173
Topalov,V2741Kramnik,V2811½–½20174th Shamkir Chess 20173
Radjabov,T2710Harikrishna,P2755½–½20174th Shamkir Chess 20173
Kramnik,V2811Harikrishna,P27551–020174th Shamkir Chess 20174
Mamedyarov,S2772Radjabov,T2710½–½20174th Shamkir Chess 20174
Adams,M2761Eljanov,P2751½–½20174th Shamkir Chess 20174
Wojtaszek,R2745Karjakin,S2783½–½20174th Shamkir Chess 20174
Topalov,V2741So,W2822½–½20174th Shamkir Chess 20174
So,W2822Kramnik,V28111–020174th Shamkir Chess 20175
Karjakin,S2783Topalov,V27411–020174th Shamkir Chess 20175
Harikrishna,P2755Mamedyarov,S2772½–½20174th Shamkir Chess 20175
Eljanov,P2751Wojtaszek,R2745½–½20174th Shamkir Chess 20175
Radjabov,T2710Adams,M2761½–½20174th Shamkir Chess 20175

Stand nach fünf Runden

Rg. Titel Name Land ELO 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Pkt. Perf. Wtg.
1 GM Shakhriyar Mamedyarov
 
2768     1 1 ½       ½ ½ 3.5 / 5 2911  
2 GM Michael Adams
 
2748     ½ ½ 1 ½     ½   3.0 / 5 2832 7.50
3 GM Pavel Eljanov
 
2762 0 ½           ½ 1 1 3.0 / 5 2819 6.00
4 GM Wesley So
 
2794 0 ½       ½ 1 ½     2.5 / 5 2767 6.25
5 GM Sergey Karjakin
 
2785 ½ 0       1   ½   ½ 2.5 / 5 2759 6.00
6 GM Veselin Topalov
 
2760   ½   ½ 0   ½ 1     2.5 / 5 2777 6.00
7 GM Vladimir Kramnik
 
2809       0   ½   ½ ½ 1 2.5 / 5 2757 4.75
8 GM Radoslaw Wojtaszek
 
2749     ½ ½ ½ 0 ½       2.0 / 5 2712 5.25
9 GM Teimour Radjabov
 
2710 ½ ½ 0       ½     ½ 2.0 / 5 2701 5.25
10 GM Penteala Harikrishna
 
2770 ½   0   ½   0   ½   1.5 / 5 2620  

Die ChessBase GmbH, mit Sitz in Hamburg, wurde 1987 gegründet und produziert Schachdatenbanken sowie Lehr- und Trainingskurse für Schachspieler. Seit 1997 veröffentlich ChessBase auf seiner Webseite aktuelle Nachrichten aus der Schachwelt. ChessBase News erscheint inzwischen in vier Sprachen und gilt weltweit als wichtigste Schachnachrichtenseite.

Diskutieren

Regeln für Leserkommentare

 
 

Noch kein Benutzer? Registrieren

Wir verwenden Cookies und vergleichbare Technologien, um bestimmte Funktionen zur Verfügung zu stellen, die Nutzererfahrungen zu verbessern und interessengerechte Inhalte auszuspielen. Abhängig von ihrem Verwendungszweck können dabei neben technisch erforderlichen Cookies auch Analyse-Cookies sowie Marketing-Cookies eingesetzt werden. Hier können Sie der Verwendung von Analyse-Cookies und Marketing-Cookies widersprechen. Weitere Informationen finden Sie in unserer Datenschutzerklärung.