Topalov gegen Kramnik: Analyse der zweiten Partie

25.09.2006 – Nach zwei Partien hätte Veselin Topalov mit 1,5:0,5 in Führung liegen können, stattdessen steht es 2:0 für Kramnik Der FIDE-Weltmeister macht eine Menge Druck, doch Kramniks Verteidigung ist hartnäckig und kaltblütig. Und bisher fehlte Topalov auch die Präzision, um seine Vorteile in Punkte umsetzten zu können. Großmeister Mihail Marin hat die zweite Partie kommentiert (in englischer Sprache) und weist darauf hin, dass alle Fehler in außerordentlich schwierig zu durchschauenden Situationen geschahen. Die Betrachtung der Partien mit mitlaufendem Fritz oder anderen Analsyseengines verführe den Zuschauer dazu, den Schwierigkeitsgrad der entsprechenden Position völlig zu unterschätzen und die (großartige) Leistung der Spieler nicht angemessen zu beurteilen. In der gestrigen Partie hätte Topalov wohl noch bis kurz vor Schluss mindestens Remis erreichen können, lautet Marins Urteil. Wettkampfseite...Analyse (engl.)...

ChessBase 14 Download ChessBase 14 Download

ChessBase 14 ist die persönliche Schach-Datenbank, die weltweit zum Standard geworden ist. Und zwar für alle, die Spaß am Schach haben und auch in Zukunft erfolgreich mitspielen wollen. Das gilt für den Weltmeister ebenso wie für den Vereinsspieler oder den Schachfreund von nebenan.



Veselin Topalov vs Vladimir Kramnik

12 Partien
23.September bis 12.Oktober
Beginn jeweils 15 Uhr MESZ
Live auf der
offiziellen FIDE Seite und auf


Partie 1 zum Nachspielen...

Partie 2 zum Nachspielen...

Commentary on Game Two

The following express commentary was provided to us by Romanian GM Mihail Marin, who is the author of a number of very popular ChessBase training CDs and articles for ChessBase Magazine. GM Marin will study the game from the World Championship in Elista in greater detail and provide the results of his analysis in the next issue of ChessBase Magazine. Note that there is a replay link at the end of the game. Clicking this will produce a (separate) JavaScript replay window, where you have replay buttons but can also click on the notation to follow the moves.


Topalov,V (2813) - Kramnik,V (2743)
WCh Elista RUS (2), 24.09.2006 [Mihail Marin]

Another highly dramatical game. Topalov built up an iresistible king side attack but then missed a simple win and started playing less confidently. Kramnik's main merit consists of finding ways to face his opponent with difficult psychological problems. The score is 2-0 now for Kramnik, but given the elevated tension of the fight this could be of little relevance from the point of view of the final result. 1.d4 d5 2.c4 c6 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.Nf3 dxc4 5.a4 Bf5 6.e3 e6 7.Bxc4 Bb4 8.0-0 Nbd7 9.Qe2 Bg6 10.e4 0-0 11.Bd3 Bh5 12.e5 Nd5 13.Nxd5 cxd5 14.Qe3 This can be considered a classical line already. Black has a solid position, but White's advantage of space offers him chances for a king side attack, be it of strategic or tactical nature. Recently, Black's earlier deviations such as 9...Bg4, 9...Ne4 and 11...h6 have become increasingly popular. Actually, 9...Ne4 can hardly be called a new move; it has just been well forgotten for a long while, but it was employed during the Alekhine-Euwe matches. Kramnik himself faced 9...Bg4 against Bacrot in the Olympiad and failed to prove a convincing antidote.

14...Bg6 15.Ng5 Re8 16.f4 Bxd3 17.Qxd3 f5 Starting with this moment, I expected that Topalov would sacrifice the knight on e6 in a way or another, but his plan looks more logical. By gradually concentrating all his forces on the king side, he will create very dangerous threats.

18.Be3 Nf8 19.Kh1 Rc8 20.g4 Qd7 21.Rg1 Be7 22.Nf3 My shattered ilusions about a possible Nxe6 were compensated by the spectacular sequence starting with the 28th move. 22...Rc4 23.Rg2 fxg4 24.Rxg4 Rxa4 25.Rag1 g6 26.h4 Without calculating too much, is it easy to unerstand that Black's position cannot resist for too long. 26...Rb4 27.h5 Qb5.

28.Qc2!! The only way to keep the attack going. 28.hxg6? was premature because after 28...Qxd3 29.gxh7+ Kxh7 30.Rg7+ Kh6 31.f5+ the bishop is hanging. 28...Rxb2 29.hxg6! But now, the previous variation leads to mate, so Black has to keep the g-file closed, at least for a while. 29...h5 30.g7! hxg4 31.gxf8Q+

31...Bxf8? Both players started missing things by this moment. This is easy to spot when assisted by Fritz, but in conditions of over-the-board play things are different. About the yesterday's game it has been said that 57...f5 was a terrible blunder and that 57...Nxf2 would have drawn easily. I do not feel that this is really so obvious without an engine by one's side. Anyway, I suppose that Kramnik considered the line 31...Kxf8 32.Qg6 Qe2 33.Qxg4 as completely hopeless for him, which may be true in principle, but Black could prolongue the fight with 33...Bg5!? when White has to insert 34.Re1 before he captures the bishop. The move played in the game should have led to an abrupt end.

32.Qg6+? Both players must have had their eyes focused on the king side, which made them overlook that after 32.Rxg4+ Bg7 White can attack the g7-bishop from the other side with 33.Qc7 preventing ...Re7 (which could follow after 33.Qg6) and leaving Black with the possibility of giving just one last check with 33...Qf1+ when 34.Ng1 ends the day. Although Topalov's move does not let the win slip away yet, it surely marks the start of his gradual decline, after a brilliantly conducted first part of the game. This seems to be a hidden weakness of the FIDE World Champion. Sometimes, if the opponent gets some symbolic counterplay in a basically lost position, Topalov starts becoming less confident. (To a certain extent, this was also typical for Fischer, with whom Topalov has been frequently been compared for his uncompromising style). In Topalov-Leko Linares 2005 and Topalov-Anand San Luis 2005 he just missed relatively simple wins but in Aronian-Topalov Morelia 2006 he even came close to losing at a certain moment. This game continues this unfortunate tendency: he will eventually lose the full point... 32...Bg7 33.f5 Re7 34.f6 Qe2 35.Qxg4 Rf7.

36.Rc1. Computers suggest 36.Qh5 as stronger and they might be just right, but this is pretty hard to spot during the game by a mere mortal, be him a World Champion. Topalov's choice is perfectly understandable, humanly speaking. 36...Rc2 37.Rxc2 Qd1+ 38.Kg2 Qxc2+ 39.Kg3 Qe4 A culminating moment. Black desperately tries to simplify the position, even if this would imply making some positional or material concessions on the king side since his apparently inoffensive queen side pawns will be a terrible weapon in the ending. White faces now a very difficult choice right before the control.

40.Bf4. It will require a lot of analytical effort to prove which exactly is the move that turns a better (or winning) position into a worse (or losing) one, but I feel we are quite close to it by now. (please do read CBM 115 for further details). 40.Qxe4 dxe4 41.Ng5 would have lead to relatively similar positions as in the game, with the difference that White could put his pawns into motion more quickly. For instance 41...Bf8 (White should win after 41...Bxf6 42.Nxf7 Kxf7 43.exf6 Kxf6 44.Kf4 although some elementary technique is still needed.) 42.Nxe6 a5 43.Ng5 Bh6 (The pawn race favours White after 43...a4 44.Nxf7 Kxf7 45.d5 a3 46.Bd4 followed by e6+) 44.d5 when the white pawns look pretty awesome. 40...Qf5 41.Qxf5 exf5 42.Bg5. Topalov likes to do things in systematic way, approach with the king, maintain the chain of pawns intact, and so on, but there is simply not enough time for it! There are two enemy passed pawns on the other wing! Capturing the bishop or 42.Ng5 would have been better.

42...a5 43.Kf4 a4 44.Kxf5 a3 45.Bc1 Bf8 46.e6 Rc7 47.Bxa3 Bxa3 48.Ke5 Rc1 49.Ng5 Rf1. Allowing the transposition to a problematic ending. 49...Rg1!? would have probably been simpler. 50.e7 Re1+ 51.Kxd5 Bxe7 52.fxe7 Rxe7 53.Kd6.

Humanly speaking, this position should be a draw. White's forces are perfectly coordinated and the elimination of the b-pawn should not be a problem. Tablebases seem to have a different opinion.53...Re1 It will take me some time to understand why 53...Re3, as noted by John Nunn, is here the only winning move. 54.d5 Kf8 55.Ne6+. But now, 55.Kd7 looks better for human standards and it is the only saving move according to Nunn and the tablebases, too. So, humans and computers can have common views sometimes. 55...Ke8 56.Nc7+ Kd8 57.Ne6+ Kc8. It's all over now. 58.Ke7 Rh1 59.Ng5 b5 60.d6 Rd1 61.Ne6 b4 62.Nc5 Re1+ 63.Kf6 Re3 0-1. [Click to replay]






Discussion and Feedback Join the public discussion or submit your feedback to the editors


Regeln für Leserkommentare


Noch kein Benutzer? Registrieren